2024 MID YEAR UPDATE | JULY 2024
In our mid-year briefing we look at key topics that Company Secretaries are likely to be focusing on.
(All links to regulations, legislation and guidance are set out in an Appendix at the end of the article.)
1. Rising Audit Fees / Audit Tenders
Applicable to: All UK entities required to carry out a statutory audit
In February 2024 the Quoted Companies Alliance published research about the rising cost of audits in the UK, its views on the reasons for the rises, and the impact this was having on companies (It Doesn’t Add Up: The Crisis of Unaffordable Audits). The research showed that from 2017/18 to 2022/23 audit fees have increased on average by 127%. Reasons cited were the regulatory landscape, risk appetite and auditor selectivity, resourcing challenges in audit firms and profitability.
Like many other Company Secretaries, we have noticed that this is having a significant impact on our companies and clients both in terms of cost burden (particularly small and mid-cap size companies) and availability of auditors due to reduced willingness of audit firms to take on companies requiring specialist knowledge, or those seen as higher risk. If your company is affected by ever increasing audit fees, it is likely that the subject of an audit tender has been raised. We have set out below a starter for ten should you be considering a tender.
What should you consider if you think a change of auditor is appropriate?
Actions for the Company Secretary
2. Cyber Governance
Applicable to: All UK listed entities
At the start of the year the Department for Science, Innovation and Technology (“DSIT”) invited businesses and organisations to provide feedback on a proposed Cyber Governance Code of Practice (the “Code”). The Code focuses on the critical areas that directors and business leaders need to be aware of and engage on. Whilst support in this area is welcomed, it is important that where companies have not done so already, they start having discussions about cyber governance right away.
The cyber security landscape is forever evolving, and it is crucial that Boards keep up to date. In their 2024 Benchmark Policy Guidelines, Glass Lewis stated that cyber risk is material for all companies, and that they “believe that it is critical that companies evaluate and mitigate these risks to the greatest extent possible. With that view, we encourage all issuers to provide clear disclosure concerning the role of the board in overseeing issues related to cybersecurity, including how companies are ensuring directors are fully versed on this rapidly evolving and dynamic issue.”
We are all aware that ensuring a strong cyber governance framework is in place will help build and maintain cyber resilience, which is one of many important elements that will support a company’s long-term success. But where do you start?
Actions for the Company Secretary
When considering how your Board should approach cyber security, remember that one size does not fit all, and as such a framework that one company uses may not suit another. It is acknowledged that a top-down approach is necessary to manage cyber risks, and we recommend that companies agree their own set of principles in relation to cyber security governance.
From there, your company will need to embed cyber security into its risk management framework and the Risk Committee may need to have a role too. The controls that have been put in place will need to be tested using internal as well as external resource, and action plans created with lessons learnt, initiatives highlighted as part of the testing, and outputs from scenarios analyses.
We appreciate that this is a huge topic to cover in a few paragraphs, however, if you would like further information on how to support your board in this area, please contact us.
3. AGMs
Applicable to: All UK listed companies
As we are all aware there has been a steady increase in the number of AGMs which have seen shareholder activism. Protestors are seeking to disrupt meetings with many hoping to force them to be abandoned and attract media attention.
In a recent article, EQ have advised that by leveraging AGM services, maintaining decorum, and addressing activist concerns with diligence, boards can navigate disruptive forces while upholding the integrity of shareholder meetings. Embracing transparency and responsiveness fosters a culture of trust and collaboration, laying the foundation for sustainable corporate success. By incorporating these strategies, organisations can navigate the complexities of AGM meetings with confidence, ensuring they remain constructive forums for shareholder engagement and governance excellence.
Actions for the Company Secretary
For a comprehensive guide on effectively managing AGMs amidst disruptive forces, we would recommend that you read EQ’s article: Navigating Disruptors And Activists At Annual General Meetings (equiniti.com)
4. Economic Crime and Corporate Transparency Act
Applicable to: All UK entities
The Economic Crime and Corporate Transparency Act 2023 (the “Act”) is a wide-ranging piece of legislation that aims to crack down on economic crime and improve transparency over UK companies and other legal entities. The first two sections of the Act came into force on 26 December 2023 and since then secondary legislation has brought with it several key changes.
These changes have included, among other things, enhanced registrar powers, enhanced scrutiny of company names, register office address requirements, registered email address requirement and confirmation of lawful activities. There was also an increase in Companies House fees on 1 May 2024 because of the new powers introduced through the Act.
These changes are just the start as there are several changes that are not yet in force but are expected later this year. To highlight just a few, these changes include the following:
1. Identity Verification for Directors and Others: The new identity verification requirements for directors, Persons exercising Significant Control (“PSCs”) and those delivering documents to Companies House are still to be implemented. Businesses will need to put in place systems and processes to comply with these requirements. The requirements are not yet known but it is intended that identify verification will be a one-off requirement. There will also be a transition period once the relevant provisions are in force and verification can be carried out either directly or through an Authorised Corporate Service Provider.
2. Directors’ Disqualification: Failure to comply with the identify requirements will be an offence. The Act introduces provisions allowing directors to be disqualified for persistently not complying with the identity verification requirements and filing obligations. Once the rules come into force, disqualified individuals cannot be appointed as directors without court permission. In addition, existing directors will automatically cease to hold office if disqualified.
3. Corporate Directors: It is expected that the reforms related to corporate directors will be implemented once the new director identity verification systems are in place. Once they are implemented, all directors of a corporate director must be natural persons with verified identities. There will be transition provisions for existing companies, and they will have 12 months to ensure that they comply with the new requirements. Any corporate directors not incorporated in the UK will also need to be registered within the UK.
4. Statutory Registers: Companies will no longer be required to maintain certain statutory registers at their registered office address. Instead, these registers will be held centrally at Companies House. These registers include the register of directors, the register of directors’ residential addresses, the register of secretaries and the PSC register. This will ease the burden for smaller companies, but larger organisations may wish to retain these registers locally for useful reference.
5. PSC Register: New duties will require companies to collect and report information about PSCs to Companies House. The PSC register will also be centrally held at Companies House.
6. Register of Members: The Act requires that the register of members is maintained at a Company’s registered office, recording full names and service addresses of members. Once the new law takes effect, Companies will need to provide member information in a one-off confirmation statement.
7. Failure to Prevent Fraud: This standalone offence has still to be implemented and will mean that a “large” organisation could be criminally liable if they fail to prevent fraud committed for its benefit by a person associated with it. This could be an employee, agent or subsidiary. A “large” organisation will be one that has two or more of the following conditions in a financial year: more than 250 employees, £36 million in sales and £18million in assets.
Actions for the Company Secretary
5. Board performance reviews
Applicable to: All UK entities
As we pass the mid-year point it is a good chance to circle back and re-focus on Board performance reviews, especially as the new UK Corporate Governance Code 2024 places particular emphasis on them. If a review is due to take place in H2 now is a good time to start planning.
Alternatively, if a review has already been completed this year, make sure that any outputs are captured, and an action plan is prepared and approved by your board. Many Company Secretaries have expressed the view that Boards approach effectiveness reviews as an annual box-ticking exercise, whereas in fact, there are a number of steps around assessing and monitoring that need to be taken throughout the year to ensure continuous improvement.
Actions for the Company Secretary
6. Parker Review
Applicable to: FTSE 350 and large private companies
On 11 March 2024, the Parker Review Committee published an update with the 2023 results of its voluntary census on the ethnic diversity of boards of FTSE 350 companies and 50 of the UK’s largest private companies. For the first time the Parker Review (the “Review”) has considered data on senior management teams and 50 of the UKs top private companies and posed the question – what should the share / proportion of directors from ethnic backgrounds be by the end of 2027?
As part of its inception in 2015, the Review set voluntary targets for FTSE 100 companies to have at least one ethnic minority director on the board by December 2021 or, for FTSE 250 companies, by December 2024.
The report highlights:
Actions for the Company Secretary
7. Quoted Companies Alliance (“QCA”) Corporate Governance Code 2023
Applicable to: All UK entities that apply the QCA Corporate Governance Code, including AIM, Main Market, the Aquis Stock Exchange and private companies which may opt to float in the future
As you will be aware, on 13 November 2023, the QCA issued the third edition of its Corporate Governance Code (the “Code”). The new Code was effective from 1 April 2024, so 2025 will be the first year that most companies report against it, and those companies with a financial period starting since that date should already be in the process of adopting it. The good news is that the QCA has confirmed that there is a transitional period of 12 months allowing companies the flexibility to adjust. Companies are, however, being encouraged to use this period to focus on more usage of explanations on certain areas where there have been changes to the Code. The QCA has not made too many changes in the new Code principles as it was keen not to add more, or duplicate, disclosure requirements for its members. Instead, it remains practical with companies being allowed to disclose according to their own circumstances.
Actions for the Company Secretary
8. Transferring from AIM to Main Market
Applicable to: AIM-quoted companies
There has been much talk about how to plan and execute a successful IPO, but what if your company is already on the Alternative Investment Market (“AIM”), a sub-segment of the London Stock Exchange, and is considering the move to Main Market? Access to the Main Market brings with it various benefits, however, the Company Secretary must be aware of the initial challenges and the significant ‘step-up’ required from a governance perspective to support the company in its long-term goals.
As Company Secretary, what are your main considerations and how can you support your Board with the transition? There are several practical governance considerations that companies must consider for a smooth changeover. From changes in regulatory compliance, guidance, and company law to potentially appointing different advisers. There is no fast-track procedure for transfer – the AIM listing must be cancelled and a whole new application process to the Main Market undertaken including a prospectus. The Company Secretary’s role in providing and verifying information for the prospectus should not be underestimated!
Actions for the Company Secretary
Here at Prism Cosec we have drafted a useful aide-memoir focusing on the Company Secretary’s role in such a situation (Transferring From AIM To Main Market – The Company Secretary’s Role In Moving Up (equiniti.com). This article aims to set out some of the key governance areas that should be considered on a transfer from AIM to the Main Market.
9. New UK Corporate Governance Code - Updated Guidance
Applicable to: All entities that apply the UK Corporate Governance Code
The new UK Corporate Governance Code (“the UK Code”) was published on 22 January 2024 and applies to financial years beginning on or after 1 January 2025, except for Provision 29 (review and reporting of internal controls) which will apply to financial years beginning on or after 1 January 2026.
Following publication of the UK Code, the FRC has also published updated UK Corporate Governance Guidance (“Guidance”). The purpose of the Guidance it ‘to aid boards with their actions and decisions when applying the Code’ and to ‘support those who use the Code by providing advice, further detail and examples’. The FRC has confirmed it will regularly review the Guidance.
This Guidance incorporates other previously published FRC guidance including ‘The Guidance on Board Effectiveness, Guidance on Audit Committees’ and ‘Guidance on Risk Management and Related Financial and Business Reporting’. The Guidance refers to another piece of existing FRC guidance ‘Improving the Quality of Comply or Explain Reporting’, which was published in February 2021. There is increasing focus on comply or explain reporting, particularly with the publication of the Code and recent FRC Reviews of Corporate Governance Reporting. These reviews have found that tick box exercises continue to be the preferred approach over high quality reporting of effective governance practice and frameworks, and they have highlighted a lack of sufficient and original narrative on explanations for departures from the Code.
The Guidance also includes a helpful set of questions for each section of the Code that will encourage discussion and consideration of current governance practices by the Board. These questions also focus on more specific topics in places, such as the extension of length of service of Board members. There is also a new section that aims to support the effective management of board committees ‘Good Practice Guidance for The Successful Management of Board Committees’ which takes into account the fact that board committees have comparable composition and practices.
Actions for the Company Secretary
10. Taskforce on Nature-related Financial Disclosures (“TNFD”)
Applicable to: All UK listed entities that are in scope
As you will recall, the TNFD was launched in 2021 in response to the increasing demand for nature-related risks to factor into financial and business decisions and has since been endorsed on a global scale. The TNFD published the final version of its recommendations for a disclosure framework and a suite of additional guidance September 2023, and shares similarities with the Taskforce on Climate-related Financial Disclosures (“TCFD”).
The 14 recommendations are grouped into the same four pillars as the TCFD; these are governance, strategy, risk and impact management, and metrics and targets. They are also consistent with the International Sustainability Standards Board and the Global Reporting Initiative reporting standards. This is great news, as it means those that are already reporting TCFD will have a good framework and model from which to start.
As with TCFD, the TNFD will track voluntary market adoption on an annual basis through an annual report beginning 2024, and the first mandatory reporting is anticipated for FY25. Although not all companies will be in scope, it is advisable to start thinking about how you might prepare your company.
Actions for the Company Secretary
We hope that this article was of use and interest to you. For further information please visit our Company Secretarial Services page or find out how we can help and support you.
Find out more Talk to us today
July 2024
Contributors: Emma Hunt, Sian Cotton, Karen O’Donnell, Kate Smith, Charlotte Maybury, Madeleine Cordes, Monika Degun, Lisa Graham and Mark Mulcahy.
Appendix:
Publications: