open navigation close navigation Menu
Asian Woman In Officeedited

2024 MID YEAR UPDATE | JULY 2024

Ten Hot Topics For Company Secretaries

In our mid-year briefing we look at key topics that Company Secretaries are likely to be focusing on. 


 

(All links to regulations, legislation and guidance are set out in an Appendix at the end of the article.)

1. Rising Audit Fees / Audit Tenders

Applicable to: All UK entities required to carry out a statutory audit

In February 2024 the Quoted Companies Alliance published research about the rising cost of audits in the UK, its views on the reasons for the rises, and the impact this was having on companies (It Doesn’t Add Up: The Crisis of Unaffordable Audits). The research showed that from 2017/18 to 2022/23 audit fees have increased on average by 127%. Reasons cited were the regulatory landscape, risk appetite and auditor selectivity, resourcing challenges in audit firms and profitability.

Like many other Company Secretaries, we have noticed that this is having a significant impact on our companies and clients both in terms of cost burden (particularly small and mid-cap size companies) and availability of auditors due to reduced willingness of audit firms to take on companies requiring specialist knowledge, or those seen as higher risk. If your company is affected by ever increasing audit fees, it is likely that the subject of an audit tender has been raised. We have set out below a starter for ten should you be considering a tender.

What should you consider if you think a change of auditor is appropriate?

Actions for the Company Secretary

  • Read the FRC’s (in full) guidance on best practice audit tendering.
  • Be mindful of legislative requirements, such as s523 and s519 Companies Act 2006 and Statutory Auditors and Third Country Auditors Regulations 2016.
  • Ensure you are clear about what aspects of the audit tender process are mandatory and which are best practice.
  • Engage with your Audit Committee at the earliest opportunity as it should lead the process rather than executive management.
  • Brief your Audit Committee on tenders in advance to ensure that they are aware of what is required from the members and what the legal requirements are.
  • Set a timetable for the process at the earliest opportunity.
  • Understand in detail what you as Company Secretary will be required to do on resignation of an auditor should the Board decide to change. This is a complex area with the audit firms having their own prescribed procedures and there are Companies Act requirements on notifying shareholders and making announcements if you are a listed company.

2. Cyber Governance

Applicable to: All UK listed entities

At the start of the year the Department for Science, Innovation and Technology (“DSIT”) invited businesses and organisations to provide feedback on a proposed Cyber Governance Code of Practice (the “Code”). The Code focuses on the critical areas that directors and business leaders need to be aware of and engage on. Whilst support in this area is welcomed, it is important that where companies have not done so already, they start having discussions about cyber governance right away.

The cyber security landscape is forever evolving, and it is crucial that Boards keep up to date. In their 2024 Benchmark Policy Guidelines, Glass Lewis stated that cyber risk is material for all companies, and that they “believe that it is critical that companies evaluate and mitigate these risks to the greatest extent possible. With that view, we encourage all issuers to provide clear disclosure concerning the role of the board in overseeing issues related to cybersecurity, including how companies are ensuring directors are fully versed on this rapidly evolving and dynamic issue.

We are all aware that ensuring a strong cyber governance framework is in place will help build and maintain cyber resilience, which is one of many important elements that will support a company’s long-term success. But where do you start?

Actions for the Company Secretary

When considering how your Board should approach cyber security, remember that one size does not fit all, and as such a framework that one company uses may not suit another. It is acknowledged that a top-down approach is necessary to manage cyber risks, and we recommend that companies agree their own set of principles in relation to cyber security governance. 

  • Firstly, make sure cyber governance is on the Board’s agenda on a regular basis, and the Board hears from the IT Director and those responsible for this area operationally. To establish a culture of cyber resilience the Board must lead the way.
  • Be clear about the legal and regulatory requirements and ensure that your directors are fully briefed about their duties and responsibilities in each of these areas.
  • Understand the relevant skills and experience that your board may already have in this area (this can be captured via the skills matrix and board evaluation process), and from there agree roles and responsibilities for the board members, executive management, and key contacts within the business. Consider training or a program of deep dives.
  • Start working towards agreeing a cyber security governance strategy and put in place a framework. Bear in mind that clear decision-making paths should be agreed, along with structured reporting to the Board to provide them with the information the directors need to understand the risks and mitigations, and to allow them to challenge.
  • Assurance and data verification should also be a key focus.

From there, your company will need to embed cyber security into its risk management framework and the Risk Committee may need to have a role too. The controls that have been put in place will need to be tested using internal as well as external resource, and action plans created with lessons learnt, initiatives highlighted as part of the testing, and outputs from scenarios analyses.

We appreciate that this is a huge topic to cover in a few paragraphs, however, if you would like further information on how to support your board in this area, please contact us.

3. AGMs

Applicable to: All UK listed companies

As we are all aware there has been a steady increase in the number of AGMs which have seen shareholder activism. Protestors are seeking to disrupt meetings with many hoping to force them to be abandoned and attract media attention.

In a recent article, EQ have advised that by leveraging AGM services, maintaining decorum, and addressing activist concerns with diligence, boards can navigate disruptive forces while upholding the integrity of shareholder meetings. Embracing transparency and responsiveness fosters a culture of trust and collaboration, laying the foundation for sustainable corporate success. By incorporating these strategies, organisations can navigate the complexities of AGM meetings with confidence, ensuring they remain constructive forums for shareholder engagement and governance excellence.

Actions for the Company Secretary

  • Preparation is key, so be sure to engage with all key stakeholders within your company well in advance. Consider holding regular meetings with representatives from each area so that roles and responsibilities are clearly assigned, and crucial elements don’t get forgotten.
  • Create a meticulous plan which should also, depending on the level of risk of disruption to your AGM, include scenario planning so that you’re ready for all likely eventualities. This would include briefing the Board on likely questions.
  • Ensure that your Board is effectively communicating with shareholders not only in advance of the AGM, but at suitable points throughout the year.
  • It may seem obvious but make sure that your Board is aware of, and truly understands, all contentious issues and the views of dissenting shareholders.
  • Keep your Board up to date on how preparations are progressing – this is an incredibly important event for them, so a clear and regular line of communication will help support and provide assurance.
  • And finally, check whether your company has been selected as a target by online groups and networks which have been set up to support activists.

For a comprehensive guide on effectively managing AGMs amidst disruptive forces, we would recommend that you read EQ’s article: Navigating Disruptors And Activists At Annual General Meetings (equiniti.com)

4. Economic Crime and Corporate Transparency Act

Applicable to: All UK entities

The Economic Crime and Corporate Transparency Act 2023 (the “Act”) is a wide-ranging piece of legislation that aims to crack down on economic crime and improve transparency over UK companies and other legal entities.  The first two sections of the Act came into force on 26 December 2023 and since then secondary legislation has brought with it several key changes.

These changes have included, among other things, enhanced registrar powers, enhanced scrutiny of company names, register office address requirements, registered email address requirement and confirmation of lawful activities.  There was also an increase in Companies House fees on 1 May 2024 because of the new powers introduced through the Act.

These changes are just the start as there are several changes that are not yet in force but are expected later this year.  To highlight just a few, these changes include the following:

1. Identity Verification for Directors and Others: The new identity verification requirements for directors, Persons exercising Significant Control (“PSCs”) and those delivering documents to Companies House are still to be implemented. Businesses will need to put in place systems and processes to comply with these requirements.  The requirements are not yet known but it is intended that identify verification will be a one-off requirement.  There will also be a transition period once the relevant provisions are in force and verification can be carried out either directly or through an Authorised Corporate Service Provider. 

2. Directors’ Disqualification: Failure to comply with the identify requirements will be an offence. The Act introduces provisions allowing directors to be disqualified for persistently not complying with the identity verification requirements and filing obligations. Once the rules come into force, disqualified individuals cannot be appointed as directors without court permission. In addition, existing directors will automatically cease to hold office if disqualified.

3. Corporate Directors: It is expected that the reforms related to corporate directors will be implemented once the new director identity verification systems are in place. Once they are implemented, all directors of a corporate director must be natural persons with verified identities. There will be transition provisions for existing companies, and they will have 12 months to ensure that they comply with the new requirements.  Any corporate directors not incorporated in the UK will also need to be registered within the UK.

4. Statutory Registers: Companies will no longer be required to maintain certain statutory registers at their registered office address. Instead, these registers will be held centrally at Companies House. These registers include the register of directors, the register of directors’ residential addresses, the register of secretaries and the PSC register. This will ease the burden for smaller companies, but larger organisations may wish to retain these registers locally for useful reference.

5. PSC Register: New duties will require companies to collect and report information about PSCs to Companies House. The PSC register will also be centrally held at Companies House.

6. Register of Members: The Act requires that the register of members is maintained at a Company’s registered office, recording full names and service addresses of members. Once the new law takes effect, Companies will need to provide member information in a one-off confirmation statement.

7. Failure to Prevent Fraud: This standalone offence has still to be implemented and will mean that a “large” organisation could be criminally liable if they fail to prevent fraud committed for its benefit by a person associated with it.  This could be an employee, agent or subsidiary.   A “large” organisation will be one that has two or more of the following conditions in a financial year: more than 250 employees, £36 million in sales and £18million in assets.

 

Actions for the Company Secretary

  • Sign up for Companies House alerts, newsletters and email updates.  Companies House has a very useful blog which they use to talk about the work they are doing. You can sign up to it here https://companieshouse.blog.gov.uk/category/legislative-reform/
  • Check that the information held on your register of members is up to date and, if you are sending any shareholder circulars, it may be a good time to remind shareholders that they should keep you informed of any changes to their details.
  • Check that the information on your PSC register is correct and up to date.
  • Review whether you still need dormant companies in your group.  Some of the increased Companies House charges, such as the confirmation statement, will increase the cost to maintain dormant companies.

5. Board performance reviews

Applicable to: All UK entities

As we pass the mid-year point it is a good chance to circle back and re-focus on Board performance reviews, especially as the new UK Corporate Governance Code 2024 places particular emphasis on them. If a review is due to take place in H2 now is a good time to start planning.

Alternatively, if a review has already been completed this year, make sure that any outputs are captured, and an action plan is prepared and approved by your board. Many Company Secretaries have expressed the view that Boards approach effectiveness reviews as an annual box-ticking exercise, whereas in fact, there are a number of steps around assessing and monitoring that need to be taken throughout the year to ensure continuous improvement.

Actions for the Company Secretary

  • Consider if your current approach to your board performance reviews is still the most appropriate. Even if one is not formally required, would it be a good time to consider an external review? If a review is to be facilitated internally, does your questionnaire-based review really cut through to the heart of a particular matter that needs attention? Perhaps consider taking a more holistic approach.
  • Seriously consider an external review if one has not been undertaken before. Providers are easily able to tailor reviews depending on the company size and, importantly, budget. Even where boards do not believe there to be any obvious improvements, a fresh perspective may highlight operational efficiencies, suggestions for practical improvements and generate new discussions, and above all ensure the review is carried out with the necessary rigour.
  • Ensure that the individual, be it the Chair or perhaps the Senior Independent Director, that leads the performance review instils the importance, and value, of feedback from board members. It is particularly important to dig into key board relationships, as well as the effectiveness of individual directors.

6. Parker Review

Applicable to: FTSE 350 and large private companies

On 11 March 2024, the Parker Review Committee published an update with the 2023 results of its voluntary census on the ethnic diversity of boards of FTSE 350 companies and 50 of the UK’s largest private companies.  For the first time the Parker Review (the “Review”) has considered data on senior management teams and 50 of the UKs top private companies and posed the question – what should the share / proportion of directors from ethnic backgrounds be by the end of 2027?

As part of its inception in 2015, the Review set voluntary targets for FTSE 100 companies to have at least one ethnic minority director on the board by December 2021 or, for FTSE 250 companies, by December 2024.

The report highlights:

  • In December 2023, only 44% of the UK’s top 50 largest private companies had at least one ethnic minority director on their board, compared with 96% of FTSE 100 and 70% of FTSE 250 companies.
  • There are 12 ethnic minority CEOs in the FTSE 100, an increase from seven in 2022. There are also seven ethnic minority chairs.
  • People with ethnic minority backgrounds now hold 19% of all director positions in the FTSE 100, a rise from 18% in 2022.
  • The number of companies with more than one ethnic minority director is 56, compared to 49 in 2022.
  • In the FTSE 250 the proportion of all board directorships held by ethnic minority directors was 13.5%, and among the 50 largest private companies this was 11%.
  • 79% of the 222 FTSE 250 companies that responded to the voluntary census say they have now met the 2024 target of one ethnic minority director on their board.

Actions for the Company Secretary

  • Review board recruitment processes to address any perceived bias, including liaison with the recruiters.
  • Ensure Annual Report statements address ethnic as well as gender diversity, be clear about the company’s journey, targets and future intention.
  • Be mindful of the preferences of individuals on how they want to be identified; this contributes to a culture of respect, inclusion and belonging.
  • The board leads from the top, so they should be aware of what the company is doing to ensure a diverse talent pipeline for senior managers and in its own succession planning.

7. Quoted Companies Alliance (“QCA”) Corporate Governance Code 2023

Applicable to: All UK entities that apply the QCA Corporate Governance Code, including AIM, Main Market, the Aquis Stock Exchange and private companies which may opt to float in the future

As you will be aware, on 13 November 2023, the QCA issued the third edition of its Corporate Governance Code (the “Code”). The new Code was effective from 1 April 2024, so 2025 will be the first year that most companies report against it, and those companies with a financial period starting since that date should already be in the process of adopting it. The good news is that the QCA has confirmed that there is a transitional period of 12 months allowing companies the flexibility to adjust. Companies are, however, being encouraged to use this period to focus on more usage of explanations on certain areas where there have been changes to the Code. The QCA has not made too many changes in the new Code principles as it was keen not to add more, or duplicate, disclosure requirements for its members. Instead, it remains practical with companies being allowed to disclose according to their own circumstances.

Actions for the Company Secretary

  • Undertake a gap analysis: review the amendments of the new Code and look at how each principle may be applied, along with how the revised Code may affect your company’s current corporate governance practices.
  • Make sure that the board is fully briefed well in advance so that it has time to reflect on the revised Code and discuss / agree any changes.
  • Start your review of the Code early on and set out a plan of action along with a realistic timeframe to implement any changes.
  • When considering changes to your company’s corporate governance practices, where appropriate, be sure to engage with stakeholders in good time to allow any feedback to be considered and seek advice from external advisers if necessary (for example if you are putting in place a new remuneration policy).
  • For further details please contact us for a copy of an article Prism drafted comparing the 2023 QCA Code with the 2018 Code.

8. Transferring from AIM to Main Market

Applicable to: AIM-quoted companies

There has been much talk about how to plan and execute a successful IPO, but what if your company is already on the Alternative Investment Market (“AIM”), a sub-segment of the London Stock Exchange, and is considering the move to Main Market? Access to the Main Market brings with it various benefits, however, the Company Secretary must be aware of the initial challenges and the significant ‘step-up’ required from a governance perspective to support the company in its long-term goals.

As Company Secretary, what are your main considerations and how can you support your Board with the transition? There are several practical governance considerations that companies must consider for a smooth changeover. From changes in regulatory compliance, guidance, and company law to potentially appointing different advisers.  There is no fast-track procedure for transfer – the AIM listing must be cancelled and a whole new application process to the Main Market undertaken including a prospectus. The Company Secretary’s role in providing and verifying information for the prospectus should not be underestimated!  

Actions for the Company Secretary

  • If your company is considering the move from AIM to Main Market, be clear how you can support your Board not only with the transition, but how to assist them in making the decision to move.
  • Be sure that they have all relevant information in advance so that should the move be completed, it is full awareness of the increased level of regulation, disclosure requirements and continuing obligations.
  • Be clear well in advance of what will be required should the move be successfully completed – for example you’ll need to understand the new governance code being applied and the actions required from being subject to the Listing Rules.
  • Once you’re through, start thinking about how to enhance your company’s corporate governance disclosures, make sure you are fully up to date on all the additional regulations which need to be reported against.

Here at Prism Cosec we have drafted a useful aide-memoir focusing on the Company Secretary’s role in such a situation (Transferring From AIM To Main Market – The Company Secretary’s Role In Moving Up (equiniti.com). This article aims to set out some of the key governance areas that should be considered on a transfer from AIM to the Main Market.

9. New UK Corporate Governance Code - Updated Guidance

Applicable to: All entities that apply the UK Corporate Governance Code

 The new UK Corporate Governance Code (“the UK Code”) was published on 22 January 2024 and applies to financial years beginning on or after 1 January 2025, except for Provision 29 (review and reporting of internal controls) which will apply to financial years beginning on or after 1 January 2026.

Following publication of the UK Code, the FRC has also published updated UK Corporate Governance Guidance (“Guidance”). The purpose of the Guidance it ‘to aid boards with their actions and decisions when applying the Code’ and to ‘support those who use the Code by providing advice, further detail and examples’. The FRC has confirmed it will regularly review the Guidance.

This Guidance incorporates other previously published FRC guidance including ‘The Guidance on Board Effectiveness, Guidance on Audit Committees’ and ‘Guidance on Risk Management and Related Financial and Business Reporting’. The Guidance refers to another piece of existing FRC guidance ‘Improving the Quality of Comply or Explain Reporting’, which was published in February 2021. There is increasing focus on comply or explain reporting, particularly with the publication of the Code and recent FRC Reviews of Corporate Governance Reporting. These reviews have found that tick box exercises continue to be the preferred approach over high quality reporting of effective governance practice and frameworks, and they have highlighted a lack of sufficient and original narrative on explanations for departures from the Code.

The Guidance also includes a helpful set of questions for each section of the Code that will encourage discussion and consideration of current governance practices by the Board. These questions also focus on more specific topics in places, such as the extension of length of service of Board members. There is also a new section that aims to support the effective management of board committees ‘Good Practice Guidance for The Successful Management of Board Committees’ which takes into account the fact that board committees have comparable composition and practices.

Actions for the Company Secretary

  • Review the updated Guidance and give some consideration to the questions provided in the Guidance for discussion with the Chair, or Board if deemed appropriate.
  • If not done already, the Audit Committee should be commencing a review of the Company’s internal control framework and procedures in line with the UK Code and whether any external assurance may be useful.
  • Consideration can be given to early adoption of some elements of the UK Code.
  • Provide sufficient and original narrative on why any Code departures are appropriate and benefit the company.
  • Review annual report disclosures to make sure that boilerplate disclosures are avoided when reporting on corporate governance.

10. Taskforce on Nature-related Financial Disclosures (“TNFD”)

Applicable to: All UK listed entities that are in scope

As you will recall, the TNFD was launched in 2021 in response to the increasing demand for nature-related risks to factor into financial and business decisions and has since been endorsed on a global scale. The TNFD published the final version of its recommendations for a disclosure framework and a suite of additional guidance September 2023, and shares similarities with the Taskforce on Climate-related Financial Disclosures (“TCFD”).

The 14 recommendations are grouped into the same four pillars as the TCFD; these are governance, strategy, risk and impact management, and metrics and targets. They are also consistent with the International Sustainability Standards Board and the Global Reporting Initiative reporting standards.  This is great news, as it means those that are already reporting TCFD will have a good framework and model from which to start.

As with TCFD, the TNFD will track voluntary market adoption on an annual basis through an annual report beginning 2024, and the first mandatory reporting is anticipated for FY25. Although not all companies will be in scope, it is advisable to start thinking about how you might prepare your company.

Actions for the Company Secretary

  • Start planning how your company will respond to the TNFD disclosures now. TNFD will become mandatory, so it is best to start focusing on it early. Make sure it is on the Board agenda.
  • Preparation is key: put in place a plan which includes time for your Board to discuss and understand what is required of them, consider goals, engage with key stakeholders, and in time agree a roadmap. TNFD have acknowledged that it will take time for companies to adopt the disclosures.
  • The TNFD fully understand that it will be work-in-progress for some time whilst companies gather the requisite information, undertake analysis, and embed nature-related reporting procedures and processes. Just be sure to communicate plans and the company’s approach, as well as monitor and evaluate the adoption process.
  • Use the resources published by TNFD, for example, join the TNFD Forum, explore a range of Additional Guidance documents, and access their Resource database and Knowledge Hub

We hope that this article was of use and interest to you. For further information please visit our Company Secretarial Services page or find out how we can help and support you.

Find out more   Talk to us today

 


 

July 2024


Contributors:
Emma Hunt, Sian Cotton, Karen O’Donnell, Kate Smith, Charlotte Maybury, Madeleine Cordes, Monika Degun, Lisa Graham and Mark Mulcahy.

Appendix:
Publications:

share-xx